#2 reason why we should use Ranked Choice Voting in presidential elections.

The second most important reason to use Ranked Choice Voting in presidential elections is that with the current Electoral College/Winner-Take-All system if one party splits its vote with a third party candidate the winning party will be the one with the fewest votes.

This happened in the 2000 presidential election in Florida when George Bush won by only 537 votes. But the liberals split their vote between the Democratic candidate Al Gore and the Green Party candidate Ralph Nader. If we had Ranked Choice Voting in 2000 and the 97,000 voters for Ralph Nader had marked their 2nd choice for the Democrat Al Gore, their most likely option, Al Gore would have become president.

1 thought on “#2 reason why we should use Ranked Choice Voting in presidential elections.

  1. And the world would have been saved! Literally.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this:
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close